It's certainly nice that catalog numbers and other stuff is taken into account when searching, but an album called "21" getting a score of 49 when release searching for "21" is a bit weird.
Search hasn't failed, the first result matches on both title and catalogno, the second matches on just catalogno and because 21 as a value in a catalog field is rarer than in the title field it scores higher than matching on title.
Paul Taylor added a comment - 05/Apr/12 12:55 PM Perhaps catalogos boost should be lowered, but its difficult to set it so its going to work well in every case.
http://search.musicbrainz.org/ws/2/release/?query=21&dismax=true
Search hasn't failed, the first result matches on both title and catalogno, the second matches on just catalogno and because 21 as a value in a catalog field is rarer than in the title field it scores higher than matching on title.
Perhaps catalogos boost should be lowered, but its difficult to set it so its going to work well in every case.
http://search.musicbrainz.org/ws/2/release/?query=21&dismax=true
Search hasn't failed, the first result matches on both title and catalogno, the second matches on just catalogno and because 21 as a value in a catalog field is rarer than in the title field it scores higher than matching on title.