I noticed this on http://test.musicbrainz.org/release/63cf86ea-16ad-49d4-8bd3-75b783fea815
The recording http://test.musicbrainz.org/recording/d0728789-8853-4ddf-8330-5f4068e3a3bc/relationships has three relationships for the same artist - arranged, arranged bagpipe and arranged wind instruments, but the release page just displays "arranger: artistname (tracks 1, 1, 1)"
Nikki, this looks fixed, can you check now?
It's not fixed, the data was reloaded.
Recreated but with the programming relationship since it doesn't show arrangers - http://test.musicbrainz.org/release/63cf86ea-16ad-49d4-8bd3-75b783fea815
The relationships are "bagpipe programmed by つんく♂", "reeds programmed by つんく♂" and "programmed by つんく♂" but it just says "programming: つんく♂ (tracks 1, 1, 1)"
The recording page too - http://test.musicbrainz.org/recording/d0728789-8853-4ddf-8330-5f4068e3a3bc it just has "programming: つんく♂"
If the main link phrase is used this all really goes away. I'm marking as related to MBS-496, and moving to post NGS as that too is post NGS
This ticket appears to only be valid in the context of MBS-496, which as that never made into production means this isn't really valid. Shall I close this?
I moved it to a sub-task of MBS-496 so it's a bit clearer that it's part of (the original implementation of) that ticket, but I guess if you think the solution for MBS-496 is likely to be abandoned; that we can close this?
Ok, that works for now. The MBS-496 solution is indeed different now, but I'll just close it when it gets done
We don't have relationships at the bottom now. It may be a problem again if/when MBS-3971 is done, but maybe not, so there's not much point keeping this open.