[#MBS-690] Problem displaying relationship attributes - MusicBrainz JIRA

MusicBrainz Server

MBS-496

Problem displaying relationship attributes

Created: 02/Jun/10 03:59 PM Updated: 21/Apr/12 08:32 AM Resolved: 21/Apr/12 08:32 AM

Component/s:

Data display, User interface

Affects Version/s:

NGS - Beta 1

Fix Version/s:

None

Issue Links:

Relates

This issue is related to:

~~MBS-1117~~ Show relationship attributes on artist relationship pages

~~MBS-496~~ Display recording relationships on a release page

Description

« Hide

I noticed this on http://test.musicbrainz.org/release/63cf86ea-16ad-49d4-8bd3-75b783fea815
The recording http://test.musicbrainz.org/recording/d0728789-8853-4ddf-8330-5f4068e3a3bc/relationships has three relationships for the same artist - arranged, arranged bagpipe and arranged wind instruments, but the release page just displays "arranger: artistname (tracks 1, 1, 1)"

Sort Order:

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Oliver Charles added a comment - 01/Sep/10 02:35 PM

Nikki, this looks fixed, can you check now?

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

nikki added a comment - 01/Sep/10 03:51 PM

It's not fixed, the data was reloaded.

Recreated but with the programming relationship since it doesn't show arrangers - http://test.musicbrainz.org/release/63cf86ea-16ad-49d4-8bd3-75b783fea815
The relationships are "bagpipe programmed by つんく♂", "reeds programmed by つんく♂" and "programmed by つんく♂" but it just says "programming: つんく♂ (tracks 1, 1, 1)"

The recording page too - http://test.musicbrainz.org/recording/d0728789-8853-4ddf-8330-5f4068e3a3bc it just has "programming: つんく♂"

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Oliver Charles added a comment - 10/Oct/10 02:14 PM

If the main link phrase is used this all really goes away. I'm marking as related to ~~MBS-496~~, and moving to post NGS as that too is post NGS

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Oliver Charles added a comment - 29/Sep/11 03:59 PM

This ticket appears to only be valid in the context of ~~MBS-496~~, which as that never made into production means this isn't really valid. Shall I close this?

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

voiceinsideyou added a comment - 29/Sep/11 04:34 PM

I moved it to a sub-task of ~~MBS-496~~ so it's a bit clearer that it's part of (the original implementation of) that ticket, but I guess if you think the solution for ~~MBS-496~~ is likely to be abandoned; that we can close this?

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Oliver Charles added a comment - 30/Sep/11 10:05 AM

Ok, that works for now. The ~~MBS-496~~ solution is indeed different now, but I'll just close it when it gets done

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

nikki added a comment - 21/Apr/12 08:32 AM

We don't have relationships at the bottom now. It may be a problem again if/when ~~MBS-3971~~ is done, but maybe not, so there's not much point keeping this open.