As far as I can tell, the credited-as name for http://musicbrainz.org/edit/15950957 is the same as the artist name, but it's still being displayed separately. It makes it hard to tell when someone's using a different credited-as name (perhaps incorrectly) and when they're not.
Description
As far as I can tell, the credited-as name for http://musicbrainz.org/edit/15950957 is the same as the artist name, but it's still being displayed separately. It makes it hard to tell when someone's using a different credited-as name (perhaps incorrectly) and when they're not.
Oliver Charles added a comment - 06/Jan/12 09:35 AM This was introduced to fix MBS-2890, and I don't know a better way of doing it. Do you mean it shouldn't show the " as Fink" bit?
Better
IMO, we should display the disambiguation comment indeed because they are very useful for this kind of edits, but not using the AC style (as XXX) dusplay when no AC.
patate12 added a comment - 22/Feb/12 11:50 AM Here my better way of doing it suggestion from MBS-4349 :
See this edit for instance :
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/16546294Current
These artists didn't use Artist Credit but are displayed as if they did.
Better
IMO, we should display the disambiguation comment indeed because they are very useful for this kind of edits, but not using the AC style (as XXX) dusplay when no AC.
This was introduced to fix
MBS-2890, and I don't know a better way of doing it. Do you mean it shouldn't show the " as Fink" bit?