| Key: |
MBS-3684
|
| Type: |
Improvement
|
| Status: |
Closed
|
| Resolution: |
Fixed
|
| Priority: |
Normal
|
| Assignee: |
nikki
|
| Reporter: |
Luca Salini
|
| Votes: |
1
|
| Watchers: |
1
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
This report, just like the Bad Amazon URLs one, has a "physiologically high" number of results (i.e. it will never reach 0 due to a high number of false positives).
Therefore, it would be much more useful if releases were sorted according to the date they were added to the database (newest first) rather than alphabetically.
Incidentally, that was the way it was sorted in Mason; the Bad Amazon URLs report is already sorted that way, too.
|
|
Description
|
This report, just like the Bad Amazon URLs one, has a "physiologically high" number of results (i.e. it will never reach 0 due to a high number of false positives).
Therefore, it would be much more useful if releases were sorted according to the date they were added to the database (newest first) rather than alphabetically.
Incidentally, that was the way it was sorted in Mason; the Bad Amazon URLs report is already sorted that way, too. |
Show » |
Sort Order:
|
Improve sorting of the "Releases with superfluous data tracks" report
(see commit f569710a1b7b85943 which mentions mbs-3684)
Has this really been fixed? I still see the report sorted alphabetically.
http://musicbrainz.org/report/SuperfluousDataTracks