Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: MBS-3313
Type: Improvement Improvement
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Normal Normal
Assignee: Oliver Charles
Reporter: nikki
Votes: 3
Watchers: 1
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
MusicBrainz Server

New/old edits wording in edit search is misleading

Created: 24/Aug/11 08:51 AM   Updated: 19/Mar/12 03:02 PM   Resolved: 19/Mar/12 03:02 PM
Component/s: Edit system, Search
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: Bug fixes, 2012-03-12


 Description  « Hide

When I saw the dropdown on http://musicbrainz.org/search/edits , the first thing I did was look for an "all" selection, since I want to see all edits for the criteria I picked, not just the new ones. Other people might interpret it as new = open and old = closed.

This seems to actually be the sorting implemented by MBS-2667, so I think it should be changed to say that.



Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
voiceinsideyou added a comment - 09/Oct/11 01:16 PM

Yeah, I still have no idea what this should mean (and if it means pre-NGS vs post-NGS, why I'd want to differentiate between the two?)


Oliver Charles added a comment - 10/Oct/11 02:02 PM

New means "newest first" as in nearest date, while old means "oldest first" as in the oldest edit


voiceinsideyou added a comment - 10/Oct/11 03:37 PM

Hmm, that feels like a bit of a strange way to present a "sorting preference" type of option to me.

How about "Show me [edits] that [match] [all] of the following conditions: [conditions] sorted by [newest first|oldest first]"


nikki added a comment - 10/Oct/11 05:15 PM

or even just "Show me [edits] (sorted [newest first|oldest first|randomly]) that [match] [all] of the following conditions"


Simon Reinhardt added a comment - 03/Nov/11 09:41 PM

I also first interpreted it as open vs. closed and wondered why this was separate from the conditions below. Then I saw that it has "random" as well and was completely confused. The only other meaning I could come up with was pre-NGS and post-NGS but I really would never have guessed that this is the sorting. That's just not what the sentence says.

So yeah, I would do it as voiceinsideyou proposed.

Btw, what's the use case for a random oder?