http://musicbrainz.org/release/0c172091-b75a-4bfc-a2b6-09d7666c07c6/relationships blatantly lies when it states "Church has no URL relationships"
Maybe use "Church has no supported URL relationships" instead?
Even "supported" will lead to some confusion. If so, I suggest that "supported" should be an HREF linking to either pop-up or wiki help that gives a short explanation of which relationships are shown in the sidebar and why.
Moving to the next release as I won't be able to finish these today
Delaying so http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-2649 can be fixed
Decision required - should we just show all URL relationships? I'm not happy with "supported". If we don't show all URLs, what text should we use that's not confusing?
+1 show all URL relationships.
We loose so much info, like here where we miss a very valuable discography page that can help many edits.
And many times I take the time to add a new URL and the system tells me it's already linked (but it was not shown).
How about a simple link, "View all relationships"?
I like that idea, Pavan!
As an improvement over the current templates, I've replaced the "...no URL relationships" link with a "View all relationships" link that shows up if there are no "supported/allowed/whitelisted/etc" URLs.
In review at http://codereview.musicbrainz.org/r/1845/