|
See attached image: how does this look? I don't really want to make this one huge tall table – scrolling vertically isn't better than horizonally, in my opinion. One option might be to split it up into, say, multiple tables of 5-10 tracks each, and inline-block them like I have with the tiny ones in the picture. ignore the highlighting on the "track lengths" thing, that's just from chrome With a thinner browser window, the minitables thing ends up wrapping whole blocks: so you'll basically get a linebreak before one of the columns (e.g.: 1 6 11 2 7 12 3 8 13 4 9 14 5 10 15 16 21 26 17 22 27 18 23 28 19 24 20 25 Moving to next fix version, since we're in freeze. Another example of what this could look like, with a fixed-width version of tracknumbers.png Indeed, the side-by-side tracktimes in minitables.png look better than fixedwidth.png. Giving up on this for now, seems to be no agreement. Will try to remember to ask the community to vote on their preferred option and report back |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
http://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/18134966
for an example that actually works;
MBS-4970makes historic ones not appear in many cases but the formatting is essentially the same.